Monday, September 25, 2006

A hobbled hobby

So, I was reading my usual suspects when I came across a link to an article entitled: how to draw female comic characters (according to Wizard)...

Starts out simply enough, the author has scanned in some pages from a drawing style guide from the people who publish the industry "standard" Wizard Magazine at the request of one of their friends:

brown_betty asked for examples "to illustrate the exactly how and why female comic characters are illustrated differently than the male." And I thought, really, what's better to illustrate these things than the books teaching the style in the first place?
A while ago I posted some scans from Wizard How To Draw series on drawing female superheroes (here and here), and I thought I'd post a bunch more from the first book of the series on "How To Draw: Heroic Anatomy".


As everything, it starts with the basics, i.e. proportions. First the male superhero [...]


And as you can imagine from that intro, the next section in is on the female superhero. Let's just say that the pages are sad. Most commentators on this livejournal posting are as speechless as I am. But suffice it to say that if this guide is demonstrative of the editorial quality at Wizard, then bankruptcy will be too good for them. As a person who grew up reading comics, and knows for a fact that gender representations (while still leaning towards the adolescent male) are improving, reading these excerpts is like finding a guide to techniques for corporal punishment in an elementary school principal's office: you know people used to think that way, and you can't believe that someone would still be holding on to those old ideas, and you're just kind of embarrassed so you put the guide back, shake your head, and move on.

Wizard has it's share of detractors already in the comic book industry as the Wikipedia article on them states:

For many, Wizard is the most visible face of the American comics industry, and it encounters a fair amount of controversy. Critics charge that Wizard discusses mainstream American superhero comics to the exclusion of other kinds of comics; although such comics are the dominant genre among the majority of American comics buyers.


And to me that's the sad part. With so many other genres of literate comics to choose from, most people still prefer Spiderman to The Sandman. Oh well.

1 Comments:

At 10:15 PM, Blogger Doc Savage 74 said...

Hi El!
I like your posting on this subject,especially since I was an avid collector of Wizard for many years. And to take that even further, I even clipped and collected these very articles on drawing. Granted, Wizard is not what I would call the bible for the comics industry ( I would give that accolade to the Comics Journal), but I found these guides very helpful and always interesting to see what professionals within the industry have to add to this. As for the blatant sexism , hey let's not kid ourselves, most of the people who read these books are horny 12 year olds ( literally, or in my case , at heart) and I think that , in the modern sense , it's in direct lineage to such "Good Girl" artists as George Petty, Vargas,or even the latter work of a Jack Cole,or the great Bill Ward
whose women were overly voluptuous to say the least.In defense of Wizard, I do have to say that they gave equal time to Terry Moore (of Strangers In Paradise fame) and his renditions of more realistically proportioned women , which I really liked.
Re: Spidey vs Morpheus(of Sandman fame):
Yes, most people probably do like Spiderman over the Vertigo Sandman, but there's room for both in my geekiverse . Anyway, Sandman's like that book or TV show or restaurant that relatively few people go to , but in a perverse way, we enjoy the fact that it's not some commercial,monolithic entity but something of our own on a personal level.

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home