It wasn't broke, but now we have to fix it...
A few years back, I was one of those people who left home early on a weekend morning to go spend six hours walking from lower Manhattan to midtown to protest the US invasion of Iraq. I believed then that the President was not representing how I, as New Yorker whose offices are no more than a mile from Ground Zero, wanted our nation to respond to the attacks of September 11th. Afghanistan and the bin-Laden hiding, opium profiteering Taliban? Yes. No-fly-zone enclosed Iraq and the embargoed Hussein? No. So, it comes as no surprise to me then that the joint report issued by 16 of our nations convert agencies has identified the war in Iraq as being a leading contributer to the spread of terrorism and jihadism around the globe. As the times article Spy Agencies Say Iraq War Worsens Terror Threat states:
The intelligence estimate, completed in April, is the first formal appraisal of global terrorism by United States intelligence agencies since the Iraq war began, and represents a consensus view of the 16 disparate spy services inside government. Titled “Trends in Global Terrorism: Implications for the United States,’’ it asserts that Islamic radicalism, rather than being in retreat, has metastasized and spread across the globe.
An opening section of the report, “Indicators of the Spread of the Global Jihadist Movement,” cites the Iraq war as a reason for the diffusion of jihad ideology.
The report “says that the Iraq war has made the overall terrorism problem worse,” said one American intelligence official.
There's not much else to say on the subject. In two years, when this administration is finally out of office, our nation will have a lot of work to do to recover from these mistakes.
Oh yes, before anyone who disagrees with my view of the Iraq war responds with declarations that this is partisan information leaked to the press to make the administration look bad, let me add one more quotation from the times:
National Intelligence Estimates are the most authoritative documents that the intelligence community produces on a specific national security issue, and are approved by John D. Negroponte, director of national intelligence. Their conclusions are based on analysis of raw intelligence collected by all of the spy agencies.

4 Comments:
A damn shame.
You post twice and I missed them until someone from Milwaukee came to my blog from yours.
Sowwy!
Very true what they say, but what is going to be done about it? Are you saying that the admin. is not responding in any way to this info?
xo
I share your heartfelt objection to the entry into the war. I am over 40 years old, but have written to my congressman only once in my life: That was to object to congress granting Bush authority to enter Iraq. Sadly, my Massachusetts congressman voted for the war.
The rationale for going into Iraq was flawed, at best. Attacking Islamic fundamentalism by toppling a secular dictator would be comical if it wasn't so sad. While the administration has been forced to admit that Saddam had no material connection with 9/11, Republicans continue to infer connections between Iraq and 9/11 as well as to claim that Iraq is a successful example of the Bush Doctrine of preemptive military attacks against terrorists. The fact that the mismanagement of this war has only fostered terrorism adds irony to injury. The fact that a Balkanized state like Iraq was going to fall apart without central authoritarian leadership was inevitable (and the administration's inability to foresee that shows their international policy ignorance), but this administration has gone far beyond our expectations in their incompetant execution of this fiasco. Infuriatingly, in the run up to the 2000 election Bush professed an intent to bring honor and integrity back to the White House (on the heels of the Clinton sexual scandals), but instead Bush has demonstrated a mastery of doublespeak and deception that would make Orwell proud.
Rob
Amen, my friend.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home